|
|
Matrox G-Series Video Card Rounup
|
Date Posted: Mar 21 2000
|
Author: Joe
|
|
|
Posting Type: Review
|
Category: Video Card Reviews
|
Page: 10 of 14
|
Article Rank:No Rank Yet
Must Log In to Rank This Article
|
|
|
Note: This is a legacy article, imported from old code. Due to this some items on the page may not function as expected. Links, Colors, and some images may not be set correctly.
|
|
Matrox G-Series Video Card Rounup By: Joe
|
RoundUp - ZD 3D Winbench Scores
|
|
|
|
System config for all tests
|
|
|
|
CPU
|
Celery 300A @450
|
RAM
|
192mb CAS2 PC100
|
HD
|
Maxtor 6.4g U33
|
CDROM
|
54x UDMA/33
|
NIC
|
Netgear FA310
|
MB
|
Soyo 6BA+ (BX)
|
CASE
|
InWin
|
S/C
|
SB 64 AWE ISA
|
OS
|
Win98 SE
|
AGP
|
2x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3D Winbench FPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the true acid test for Matrox cards.
Unlike most Graphics cards out there that have superior 3D and low quality 2D, Matrox has Superb 2D, but looses out on 3D. After my last review on the Matrox G400MAX card, I was told by someone that it was unfair to judge Matrox cards as bad 3D performers because they are very CPU dependent, and can go faster if you just use a faster CPU. The reason is that it offloads all the Triangle work to the CPU, instead of running it in hardware like 90% of other cards do. I ran these on a Celeron @ 450Mhz, I figure its a good test machine because even though its below what some of the geeks in the world run, its still equal or faster then what most "normal" people run. 30FPS isn't that bad of a score, its fine for the low end or occasional gamer. It is more then OK for people doing CAD work. I ran 3DMAX and Lightwave 3D under it, and it was just orgasmic the speed the MAX card moved in it. VERY NICE!.
|
|
|
|
Random Forum Pic |
|
From Thread: Looking for special fittings for my WC external box |
| ProCooling Poll: |
So why the hell not? |
I agree!
|
67%
|
What?
|
17%
|
Hell NO!
|
0%
|
Worst Poll Ever.
|
17%
|
Total Votes:18Please Login to Vote!
|
|