Login to ProCooling
Name: Pass:
Not Logged In.
Search:
ProCooling Technical Discussions
Long Shot: Looking got an old radiator(heater core...
Sled_Dog 181 Day(s) ago.
Old Watercooler Returns to Custom Loops
Sled_Dog 188 Day(s) ago.
Guardian OS units
KB3NZQ 551 Day(s) ago.
What happened to the Jet design? (Cathar, where ar...
rhkcommander 586 Day(s) ago.
ProCooling Geek Bits
Fluke 17B+ ... the multimeter I've always wanted b...
Noise 281 Day(s) ago.
Ben's Win 98 box, redone! Build up
ben333 1936 Day(s) ago.
Project Black & Blue - Ben's new HTPC
ben333 1996 Day(s) ago.
Bring back IRC?
ben333 2791 Day(s) ago.
Site News and Blogs
Where is Joe these days? JoeKelly.co
Jag 53 Day(s) ago.
Stuff over the last few years, Blogs, etc...
rhkcommander 186 Day(s) ago.
New User Registrations are blocked
Joe 532 Day(s) ago.
Site is over 16 years old...
Nicepants42 752 Day(s) ago.
The Pro/Market
GTX 280 for US $308.11 !!!!!!
sam amaar 659 Day(s) ago.
FS: Laptop hardware (CPUs, Memory, HDDs, Wifi, etc...
ben333 2798 Day(s) ago.
FS external watercooling units from jpiperformance...
Halo_Master 2836 Day(s) ago.
FS Snap Server 4200
abuthemagician 2961 Day(s) ago.
Testing Testing PC cooling using die simulators vs. real CPUs
Date Posted: Dec 14 2005
Author: pHaestus
Index:
Posting Type: Article
Category: FAQ's, Editorials, Q&A's
Page: 2 of 4
Article Rank:5 from 2 Readers
Must Log In to Rank This Article
Forum Discussion Link
Testing PC cooling using die simulators vs. real CPUs By: pHaestus
Rationale for using a die simulator
There are some obvious advantages to using a simulator versus a real CPU. With a die simulator, it’s easy (relatively) to measure the heat load going into the system. As long as it’s properly insulated, just measure the current and voltage that you put in, characterize secondary losses, and voila! You now have the W for the popular C/W characterization of cooling performance. In fact, this C/W measurement really is driving the use of a die simulator. Strictly speaking, it’s not necessary for relative wb performance on a CPU.


A die simulator is also fairly flexible. If you find that you need higher quality temperature readings, then you simply upgrade to better temperature probes. Motherboard Monitor CPU readings are usually limited to 1C increments but 0.01C is easily attainable with quality dual linear thermistors or RTDs. Ideally, one would expect a die simulator to have a much longer life expectancy than a real CPU. I am referring to the fact that it can survive many processor upgrade cycles and changes in brand popularity. There’s no reason that you can’t collect data on a properly maintained die simulator of the same design and spec years from now and have a huge compilation of performance that readers still find useful. However, “proper maintenance� of a die simulator is something that is extremely difficult to do. See the next section for details on this.

Die Simulator Limitations and Problems
Testing coolers with a die simulator is not without its limitations. Most of them boil down to “perhaps you aren’t simulating your CPU very well�. This isn’t actually a problem with the die simulator per se, but rather a problem with correlating the results from the simulation back to the real world.

An observation many have made is that the results that are obtained with a die simulator are strongly affected by the physical design. Specifically, the placement of temperature probes within the die simulator and the choice of die size significantly affect results. Incoherent has demonstrated (rightly I believe) that placing multiple temperature probes in a die simulator and back-calculating a “die face temperature� can address the first problem. There is no single solution to the second problem, however. Die sizes for CPUs will always change, and the introduction of integrated heat spreaders (IHS) further complicates things if you are trying to simulate them. The bottom line is that you must choose a die size when making a die-simulator, and its facial area will have a big effect on how blocks perform (small die = high heat density; large die = low heat density) on your test bed.

To elaborate on the above, a die simulator is not nearly as simple to design as one would first guess. It’s a lot more than just “a hunk of copper with a temp probe and a heater in it� and all of the dimensions and tolerances and insulation have to be done very carefully. It is not a project you can expect to do correctly without a good bit of engineering and technicall background, and it is an expensive route to go as well.

One concern of mine is that a die simulator test is unlikely to notice things that are actually important for a reviewer to spot. It is much more difficult to spot horrible mounting mechanisms, incompatibility with common motherboards, block designs that introduce lots of torque on hoses so that blocks “tip� and don’t cool well if you aren’t using a real system to test. It is also known that air coolers that provide substantial secondary path cooling to the motherboard’s other heat sources.

Another problem not often discussed in reviews using die simulator is die flatness and finish over long time periods. It is known (via Bill Adams personal correspondence) that remounting and use of the die simulator will affect the quality of its facial area. Edges and corners of the core wear away. Constant lapping and refinishing to flatness is necessary, but very few people have the resources to do this properly. Instead we get an unknown surface that is changing at every mount. Since the die simulator is presumably being designed for “high end� testing, this is actually a much more serious problem than you might first expect.
<< Previous Page: Introduction Index:
Next Page: CPUs as Heat Sources >>
Random Forum Pic
Random Forum Pic
From Thread:
sans res?
ProCooling Poll:
So why the hell not?
I agree! 65%
What? 18%
Hell NO! 0%
Worst Poll Ever. 18%
Total Votes:17
Please Login to Vote!



(C) ProCooling.com 2005 - All this glorious web geekness was brought to you by Joe's amateur web coding skills.
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...